摘 要
鑑定人作為司法鑑定活動的具體實施主體，應當出庭接受質證，這是由其特殊的訴訟地位以及鑑定結論對於案件審判結果的決定性作用所決定的，但在我國司法實踐中，鑑定人就其鑑定結論出庭接受質證的卻極少，究其原因既有立法制度上的不完善，也有鑑定人自身的主觀原因，鑑定人不出庭作證將直接影響訴訟程式的公正，當事人的合法權益。借鑑國外相關規定，結合我國的具體情況，可以從明確鑑定人出庭作證的'義務，完善鑑定人出庭作證的人身安全保障制度及經濟補償制度等方面著手，重新構建1套有利於我國鑑定人制度良性發展的制度設計。
關鍵詞：鑑定人；鑑定結論；出庭作證；立法建議
ABSTRACT
As the main body of the appraisal,appraiser must appear to wittness in court , its because of their unusural function in the judicature as well as the decided funtion of the appraisal result to the cases result. But in our country, appraisers are always not to appear in court on their writtings to answer the questions in the indicature practice. The reasons are what the legislation is not to be perfect and also the appraisers are not to appear in the court. But the appraisers absence would affect the fair procedure directly and the legitimate rights of the litigants. Profiting by the corrlation stipulation of the oversea, and on the special detialls of our country, we can develop the system design which is good for the system of the appraiser again, by clearing about the appraisers duty and consuming the system of the personal safety protection and the economy compensates.
Key words：Appraiser ；Appraisal result： Witness in court；Legislative suggestions
..............................
注：【包括：畢業論文，任務書，開題報告】
