眾多研究生院和商學院要求申請者提交GRE考試成績，藉此評估申請者的潛質，預測他們將來在學業中的表現。下面請看GRE寫作經驗分享，幫助你留學成功。
1. 對於時間充裕的同學
機經中的高頻是出現頻率高的作文,沒有人能保證考時一定遇到高頻題. 如果還有不少時間,建議不要放棄任何一道題, 很多經驗證明了，很多考生都有可能遇到有史以來第一次考到的ISSUE和ARGU題, 所以什麼事情都是有可能發生的(就好象指出ARGU裡的邏輯錯誤一樣)
2. 對於時間不那麼充裕的同學
如何利用GRE作文機經準備ISSUE。建議準備出現頻率最高的40道ISSUE,注意這裡指的頻率指的是近兩年的總頻率,不分時間地域,同時加上本月本地出現3次以上的ISSUE題(大部分已經包括在前40道里,因此需要另外準備的不多).
拿我個人來說,我在北京考,考前準備了總頻超過30次的38道ISSUE(3.8機經的資料,現在可能有更新)+5至6道北京3月出現3次以上同時未包括在這38道中的題,考試時遇到的兩道 177,141分別出現39,38次,均為高頻。
就我考前從各種渠道瞭解的資訊，絕大部分人考時遇到一道頻數大於30的可能性是相當大的。(也許有人會說很多人並沒有來報機經，我的資料不一定可靠。這個就見仁見智了，我只是表達個人的建議，採納與否，全是個人的自由.但無疑當考前時間不夠時,準備出現機率較大的題目顯然是特殊情況下的最佳選擇了)
如何利用GRE作文機經準備ARGU。重要的是多熟悉題目,時間充裕的應該做到任何一道題都沒有不認識的單詞,不理解的語句,這樣找錯才能有的放矢.
時間不夠的,至少把考過10次以上的題目(約90多道) 加上本月本地出現過但未列入上述90多道的題目全過一遍,弄懂每一個單詞.這很重要,否則考場上碰到關鍵單詞不認識,加上緊張,可就傻眼了.拿我來說,考時遇到的是10幾頻的題,幸好考前晚上剛過了一遍,否則文中有兩個單詞都不認識,顯然會很不爽.
閱讀延伸：
優秀範文：
題目：
Too much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.
I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, that does not in any way mean that we should stop proGREssing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so. To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think most people would reject that.
Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?
What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hosptal, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.