論我國違憲審查制度的模式選擇

才智咖 人氣:3.14W

摘  要

違憲審查是特定國家機關對憲法行為是否違憲的1種裁判和處理機制, 其實質是保障公民基本權利。我國實行全國人大及其常委會違憲審查模式,但目前其存在違憲審查主體能力不足、審查物件不全、審查權責不統1和審查程式、方式存有瑕疵等問題。我國應在尊重國情、公民權利保護和機構改革效益最大化3項原則基礎上,建立由憲法監督委員會和全國人大各專門委員會分工行使違憲審查權,事前審查和事後審查相結合的'違憲審查模式。

關鍵詞:違憲審查;司法審查;違憲


Abstract

Constitutional Review is a mechanism which specific state organs magistrate and handle constitution behavior whether violates the constitution, and its essence is to protect the fundamental rights of citizens. China adopted the Constitutional Review Mode of the NPC and its standing committee, but it has some issues at present, such as the ability of Constitutional Review body is poor, the review is incomplete, the review responsibilities are not unified and review procedures and methods have flaws and so on. China should respect in the respect national condition, the rights of citizens protection and in the organization reform benefit maximization three principles foundations, established the combination of prior review and after review model, which the constitution surveillance committee sharing the exercise of the Constitutional Review power with the special committees of the NPC.

Key word: Constitutional Review; Judicial review; Unconstitutional                                                       
 ..............................
注:【包括:畢業論文,任務書,開題報告

論我國違憲審查制度的模式選擇